Sunday, September 30, 2007

Group photos


Yeah! Access to the blog site again!

Here is the group photo.

And if you want to see a slideshow of the Day 1 photos of the Multimedia bootcamp, dinner Friday night and the setting up from the Auction:
http://homepage.mac.com/nzacuto/JAWS/Day1-WI/index.html

More photos to come.

Fan letter from a Jawdess far away


I love this blog.


I have been depressed for a month since I realized I could not get away from my current assignment in Algiers and would miss camp, but I have almost felt like I'm among you all reading this today. If you could now just put up a few posts on weather, shopping bargains and gossip the experience will be almost complete.


I am in Algeria, away from the investigative center in Sarajevo, temporarily, helping out a sister program designed to bring better management to an Arabic newspaper in this North African capital. I was leery about the assignment here, in part because I didn't think I would have the gravitas as a woman expert to inspire any kind of change.


Indeed, it is maddening how women here are not mistreated so much as overlooked. Disregarded. We go into a restaurant and the waiters rush to get the order of Del, my project partner first, making sure he has drink and napkin in lap before turning to me. I ask a question and the newspaper editors -- men -- look at him when then answer. Whoa, it's so 70s and I really didn't need to relive that part of my youth.


But a funny thing has happened over the past few months. While I have been depressed contending anew with chauvinistic bosses, the veiled and complaint young women in the newsroom were watching. And what they saw was a new way of contending with chauvinistic bosses.


Actually Del noticed it first, how the women listened when I raised questions with bosses about procedures, suggested other ways to do things than their way. And then there was the time I went into a very small screaming fit that no one had been assigned to cover the opening night of the African Games in Algiers. That's hard to disregard.


These are women who already have advanced light years over their mothers -- who could never have gone to university and held jobs. We pushed it a little more, helping to install the first female section editor. She is so bright, so talented, she puts higher-ranking men to shame just by doing her work. The other women watched that too. One day the managing editor rewrote a headline on her page -- and not in a good way. What are you going to do about it, we asked her? Nothing, she told us, what could she do? Go talk to him, we suggested. That first time, she took Del in with her to open the ground-breaking conversation that he reconsider a decision. But the editor did reconsider and the next time it happened, she handled him alone.


Even the idea that Del, a man whom the bosses could not overlook, was working in cahoots with the women has shaken up things around here. We found that a young woman assigned to keeping the photo archives actually was the newsroom authority on the photo department. She knew every failing of the department and had ideas how to fix them. But this wasn't her job, she told us, she couldn't do what she wasn't told to do. Yeah, you can, we suggested. And today she is sitting in news meeting, working with photographers on better quality and dealing with editors as more of an equal.


Newswomen's lib isn't our company's mission in Algeria but it has become this highly satisfying rabble-rousing sideline, I must say. So, there you go. Many miles may separate us, but I'm still trying to live up to those JAWS goals of empowering, mentoring and supporting.


Have a great camp. See you next year. Rosemary Armao (That's me in the picture in Algerian garb, minus veil, with Nadir, our translator, near the bay in downtown Algiers.)

Charreah rocks!!!

One of our scholarship winners, Charreah Jackson, was so inspired that she composed a poem about JAWS. Her performance Saturday night ruled! We don't have audio or video yet, but here's her ode to JAWS!!


Open Wide
See Jaws are made for opening wide
Putting the fact I have both breast AND a brain aside
Telling a story the way it should be told.
Never accepting there's such a thing as too girly, too bold, too black or too old

See Jaws are made for opening wide
To sigh loudly when told "no"
No you can't write that, no you can't sit there
No because we said so, and you girls said it first, no means no

But no, we opened our jaws and said yes
Yes, I'll be the first at the copy desk
At NYT
Yes I'll be a political or sports editor
Why the hell not me?
No I won't just cook or sew
No, I won't quit because my womb has started to grow

See Jaws are made to open wide
To share the love we all have inside
A love for truth and all mankind
A love for Wisconsin cheese
And you know a glass of wine


See Jaws are built to open wide
To push aside pretension and pride
And so I thank you for opening yours
Kicking open doors that make me have a few firsts
Let the torch continue to pass and its light be our guide
Let the Jaws of Jaws always be open wide

Stories that Click, the liveblog...

Gina Setser, digital message editor at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, is ready to moderate this panel with Peggy Collins, a multimedia editor and producer for msn.com, and Nora Paul, founding director of University of Minnesota's Institute for New Media Studies.

Yes, Gina's job actually involves sending stuff to cell phones. Here's what she says:

"Each format has its own sweet spot for reaching the people formerly known as audiences. For television that would be live action, for radio that would be voice and audio, for newspapers that would be in-depth stories... For the Internet i think there are actually two sweet spots. What pulled us into it was interaction... The other would be connecting the dots."

Interaction is empowering people to do more with what we give them, connecting the dots is putting things in context.

Nora says a lot of people need to get up to speed with the issues and where are we with multimedia. She says most sites are pretty derivative - the newspaper is the Web site on paper and vice versa. They look alike with the column concept.

The road to innovation has been pretty bumpy. There's little support for R&D in news companies since 2000. There's not enough training in new skills. Then there's the assembly line production mode of print, which isn't the best for the new environment. The television mode works better. The newsroom culture is not one that adapts to change easily. And we don't necessarily understand the new news audience.

That audience uses multiple appliances, Nora says, and they receive news in multiple ways, phones, PDAs, computers, etc., etc.

"We knew what the product was before we knew how to display it, now it's up in the air. There's no real common vocabulary for this stuff," Nora says. For instance, "what does interactive mean?"

She and a grad student examined the elements of digital storytelling. There's multiple media - stories, photos, graphics, videos. Then there's multimedia, a tapestry where sound, video, text and graphics are interwoven and can't be pulled apart. Here's her example from the Times-Picayune.

There's also content action. Is it static or does it move to help tell the story in a new way? Here's an example from the BBC. Then there's user action. Here's an example from the Morning News in Dallas that requires the user to click to get content.

The third choice is about the relationship. With print, radio and television, it's relatively passive. With the Internet, you have to interact by doing.

Nora's list of rethinking storytelling:
From explaining to experiencing. The example is from MSNBC on baggage handling in which you're graded.
  • From telling to exploring. An example from the Sarasota Herald Tribune by Nora's nephew using Flash.
  • From informing to inviting opinions. An example for the Seattle Times on balancing the budget.
  • From episodic to encyclopedic. An example for the Seattle Post Intelligencer.
  • From reading it to playing it. The South Florida Sun Sentinel has a hurricane maker. It's involved, but if it's a long-lasting item it's worthwhile.
  • From reporting it to databasing. You can let people find out about different aspects of the data, like in this Philly Inquirer homicide map.
Nora has some great info on eye tracking, reading and comprehending text. Her PowerPoint will make it to the JAWS Web site soon (along with others). If you want people to spend time there, thoroughness, brand recall, use Flash.

Nora says there are a lot of newspapers that are doing a good job. Consistenly doing this are the New York Times, the Washington Post. Now the shift is that still photographers are being told to shoot video and use screen grabs for the stills. Someone mentions the Denton Record Chronicle in Texas. She notes the Minnesota Public Radio effort to get sources for use in news reports, as opposed

Now on to Peggy. She notes that she didn't even know how to instant message when she went to msn.com. Multimedia is fundamentally still storytelling. "With multimedia, there's other ways to get information that would have ended up on the cutting floor in."

But, she notes, multimedia does not fit every story. Is there something in the story that the reader would like to see? Do you have a ton of data but don't want to clutter your story with numbers?

Don't be afraid of the "webtalk." You don't necessarily have to be the one to do the Flash graphics - or even know how to operate the Flash software. "Oftentimes people through out the word but they don't know how to do it."

"Here's another untold story in multimedia land. There's a lot of talk ... about the one-man band... My prediction is that as things evolve and more and more advertising money flows in, most stories will not be done as one-man bands." She says there will be teams with different skills (this is similar to what the Arizona Star did with its package on immigration and the border with Mexico).

Unfortunately, there's often an ad tie in with video - advertisers are willing to pay a lot for those ads that run before the videos. Peggy expects once they can put ads into the interactive graphics, that will be a big sell too.

On video: Talking heads don't work - they're too boring. People want to see the people in your story, in context. She notes a story in the Boston Globe, where there's a great visual lede but only a standard newspaper refer to the video of her home. More effective would be in the lede a line that says "visit her home" you can click on. Or, Nora suggests, a video that appears alongside the lede.

Peggy strongly suggests if you're considering adding multimedia, think about it from the very beginning of the story. What is the most visual thing? Get it up high in the story.

Have a reason for the multimedia. "Not every story has to have 80 million things moving around on it."

Give viewers the control. Let them press play or roll over things. "If you build it, they will click."

A great question: Where are mobile devices going to take us? Peggy says for sure it's still evolving. Podcasts are going to be ginormous. Beaming to PDAs is going to be big. People may sign up for a weekly podcast of a columnist.

On gear: Have a good snapshot camera, get a small video camera. She says Flash software is tough to master. Pitch stories with multimedia ideas, they typically have people who can edit. Nora mentions SoundSlides is another good program, it's a $35 download. (OK, really it's $40; the new plus version is $70. Still a relative bargain.)

Others want more info on the JAWS Web site. Nora will be getting us info and we'll put it on the site.

How much does a good video camera cost? Roberta has a Flip Video camera for $100 at Target (i'll be there for that in the next day or two). Peggy notes that the quality of video on the Web doesn't need to be superfantastic - there's still a role for the well-produced television documentaries and it probably isn't on the Web. You do need some training to learn the basics of shooting and editing.


Question: Are audio slideshows here to stay? Peggy says its a good question. She doesn't see still photography dropping into the great unknown. The quality of photos here is often better. Nora says a video story is markedly different than an audio slide story - the conventions aren't established yet, though. Gina notes that half to two thirds of the hits at the AJC are on photos.

Peggy says even polls and quizzes are great tools you can use. They're easy to program in Flash (and lots of programs allow you to pop them up there)


Saturday, September 29, 2007

Paper Tigress


Making herstory (again) even as she cleans out her apartment, Betsy Wade donated her important papers to the National Women and Media Collection at the University of Missouri.

"Three linear feet!" Betsy declared as she signed the papers that gave the papers to the Collections. "That's what you've got in your attics, ladies!"

The donation was accepted by Jenny Lukomski, the assistant director for collections at the Western Historical Manuscript Collection, which will house Betsy's papers along with those of other important women in journalism, including Tad Bartimus, Sylvia Porter and Suzanne Levine.

Jenny has a display set up near the registration desk, and you can learn more about why you should follow Betsy's lead (again!) at a session Saturday afternoon.

Thoughts on the Coverage of Women from the Wilting Flowers

I just wanted to share some of our group's questions/concerns during last night's discussion:

1. How do you get top women, once in power, to approach coverage decisions differently?

There seems to be a critical mass of women in some pretty powerful traditions in the industry, but once they get there, they tend to "play along" instead of demanding better coverage of women and more sourcing from female experts.

2. Will/Is the new media provide an important outlet for women?

There was some talk about the lack of women in mainstream op-ed pages in contrast to the wealth of women blogging. How do we bridge this gap? How do we convince women to see themselves as experts and produce when they get the call?

3. How can we move beyond "women in peril" stories?

It's either Paris or the breast cancer survivor with ten kids or the missing white girl...how can we move beyond this kind of coverage?

We also had a fascinating conversation about mentoring and the intergenerational dynamic among women in the media. Clearly there is more need for older women in power to work with a generation just coming in, who may appear a bit "entitled," but who is really hungry for some wisdom.

In short: Reach out! Stick to your values once you're in power! Utilize the JAWS listserve!

Live blog! Breaking Into Major Magazines

This promises to be an informative, not to mention popular, workshop. As it's my first attempt at a live blog, I will do my best to hit the highlights! Panelists are Mary Kay Blakely, associate professor for magazine journalism, University of Missouri; Barbara Jones, deputy editor, More magazine; and Julia Kagan, health director, Ladies Home Journal. Alicia Shepard, ombudsman, National Public Radio, and author of "Woodward & Bernstein: Life in the Shadow of Watergate," is moderating. Be back in 5!

Something new! If you meet someone at a cocktail party three times, it's called a New York Friendship.

So we're starting off with a little role-playing, a fun way to communicate a key message: work your connections!!!

Make sure you read at least three past issues, know the voice of the magazine, and look at the different departments of the publication (this is courtesy of an in-the-know audience member...this place is crawling with in-the-knows!)

Barbara says look at the sections of the magazine to see if they take freelancers, especially those looking for "real" folks.

(The aforementioned in-the-know is Katherine Lanpher, New York-based writer/broadcaster/author. Met her last night. One word: dynamo.)

Some magazines pay a research fee when they ask for more information. How much, asks Jennifer L. Pozner (WIMN). Barbara says it's what they have available.

How passionate are you about a story? Are you willing to take a risk to get it published (i.e., going to a lower-paying publication). That will tell the magazine that they should take a risk on it.

Julia says often they want proposals, even from frequent contributors, because of all the eyes it has to go through on the masthead.

Alicia asks about waiting to hear back after presenting a story. Barbara notes we're in a changing landscape. The editor-in-chief is trying to make decisions, and they're fluid, plus it has to go through a train of editors. "We don't know if your proposal is going to survive the storm."

Barbara: An editor-in-chief of a magazine is no longer the EIC of a magazine; she's the EIC of a brand. That means less time for the publication. And when she has to read 100 pages a night, that adds up. IMPORTANT: If you become a pest, asking about your proposal over and over, the editor will get tired of you.

Question: What is the definition of a pest? Julia says if you haven't heard in a month, it's OK to send an e-mail. A nice, friendly, short e-mail. Do not harrass the nice editors. They feel guilty about not having more time!

Mary Kay: Don't think of yourself as a pest. Think of yourself as a person giving this editor an opportunity at compassion. Guilt is a powerful tool for a writer to use (just like motherhood).

Did you know? Do not make telephone pitches, so sayeth Julia. Alicia: Be warmly aggressive and professionally persistent.

Question: How do you protect yourself from having your ideas stolen? (And yes, it does happen, Barbara says). The more detailed the pitch, the more protected you are. There also could be multiple pitches on the same idea, so it may not be thievery.

(What do Ludacris and Kanye West have in common? Very accomplished moms who manage their careers. Who knew?)

Part II: Alicia's fake scenario proposal is accepted. What next? Julia says you get a contract. Look at if they pay on acceptance or publication...if it's the latter, it could take years (ew). Question: can you negotiate the payment? Julia says you can ask, but sometimes it's a policy written in blood.

Barbara: Be as clean as you can with contracts. You make the decisions about what you risk, and don't. If you have never written for the publication before, be safe for yourself but don't be a pain in the butt. Be reasonable about your demands, whether it's money or copyrights. Consider asking for 50 percent if you're waiting a long time for acceptance.

Mary Kay: Kill fees are unfortunately still with us in the freelance business. She asks if they're still doing North American rights? Contracts today want you to sign away rights to all publications, those existing and possibly in the future, in the universe! Don't be afraid to tweak contracts to protect your work (because who wants to see their byline in Alien Monthly in 2087? Not me.)

Alicia's fake story is accepted. Now it's fact-checking time. Julia wants all your notes, tapes, etc. Every fact has to have a source, preferably more than one, and those sources should be prepared to get a call from a fact checker. Question: Do the notes, etc., get returned. Julia says yes, but check with magazine. Katherine says some recent contracts wanted complete transcripts of tapes (double ew).

Barbara has regular writers who do their own transcription. That's gold, baby! Gold! She also has arranged for writers to have their tapes transcribed by someone else, but these are veteran contributors.

Question: Do magazines expect interviews to be recorded? Julia says it depends. If it's a prominent source, like Nancy Pelosi, tape it. She might be tough for a fact checker to track down.

Alicia asks what should be in the e-mail subject line? Julia gets 500 e-mails a week, and spends hours cleaning it out. Make sure your pitch does not get mistaken for a PR pitch. "Pitch from writer/and a strong interesting line here" (And yes, having JAWS in the subject line gets her attention!!)

Or "Katherine Lanpher send me" (but only if she did). Avoid Read Me, etc. You'll get pitched.

Wanna know how far ahead these women work? Julia is planned through March, so looking for stuff for next April. Same with Barbara. They're working on early next year editions now. (Wow.) But they do accommodate timely stories.

What do you do if you don't have an in-the-know to get you in the door at a magazine? Julia says look at the news holes in the magazine, and those features done regularly by outside contributors. Barbara says offering up an area of expertise and good writing can invite attention. Find a niche and master it. And good writing doesn't hurt. Mary Kay says offering a new view on an old subject (like diets) are great. Holiday stories are always good hooks, but get your pitch out early. Sell yourself. Funny, moving personal stories are enticing.

Key tip: Write a compelling first paragraph in your pitch. Having a niche or beat is also good, because they know you'll be an expert and can flesh out a story.

Q&A begins! Q: What are you looking for in a pitch? Julia: Strong voice. Barbara: If it's an essay, the essay.

Q: Can you pitch multiple stories along the same subject for different publications? Barbara: This happened recently (More published the same story, by the same writer, as a major weekly magazine), and now that writer is mud. Probably a good idea to stay with publication until the piece is done. But she doesn't think anything is wrong with pitching to multiple publications (and don't say that in your pitch!) Julia says most publishers would disagree with that. But if you get a positive response to a query, take it, and be honest with the other publications you've pitched. Bottom line: Get your foot in the door, however you can. (And you heard it from Barbara...white lies are occasionally OK).

www.fij.org help fund freelance journalists. Book proposals, stories, etc. Check them out!

Q: What stories are you missing, and what stories are you tired of? Barbara is good with Uganda for a while. Steer clear. Julia is done with hormones, but can handle lots of stress. Barbara is looking for a memoir, but your competition is stiff. And check out the small bits (opinions, rants, personal essay, etc.) at the front of her magazine. "We welcome voice. We want women's voices." Oh, and if you're younger than 40, you'll only have a shot at features where there's no photo. Sorry 20- and 30-somethings!

Responds Katherine: "More isn't for women 40 and under, but ha ha, everything else is!!"

Barbara adds that in the book world, youth is king. (And there's less fact-checking, says Katherine.)

Q: If a version of a story that has apperaed in a local paper or magazine, can it be resold? Julia would prefer it to be new, but a national version isn't out of the question.

Q: A freelancer asks about marketing yourself and managing your business? Mary Kay says freelancers spend about half their time marketing. Try and turn a few successful stories into a regular feature with that publication. Also pitch ideas that can be piggybacked into a book or screenplay or regular stories.

Q: What does it take to become a contributing editor? And when you pitch to two different places, how bad do you look if you have to back out of one agreement? Barbara says if two editors are fighting over your piece, that's good. Take the action and see what happens. In women's magazines, most contributing editors aren't getting any money for it. You'll get some assignments, though that may not be a contracted thing. And it's a way to keep a writer from going elsewhere, in some cases.

Talking Sourcing at JAWS - and and invitation to JAWS members

This is cross-posted from WIMN's Voices, the media analysis group blog of Women In Media & News, a national women's media analysis, media education and media advocacy group. -- Jennifer L. Pozner, Executive Director, WIMN

Quick note -- there's a powerful set of women in journalism gathered in Door County, Wisconsin this weekend for the annual Journalism & Women Symposium (JAWS) conference. Last night, I led one of twelve discussion groups about what bothers female journalists about representations of women in news media -- and what we as journalists can do to improve these content problems both in our individual reporting/editing/producing, and what we can do to affect institutional change.

Our group focused on the sourcing problem (it turned out numerous others did, too) -- the underepresentation and marginalization of women and people of color as sources, experts, pundits, commetators and the like -- and the way this flattens out stories, makes each story seem to similar to every previous story, and makes it harder for readers and viewers to see themselves reflected in our coverage... which of course loses audiences. We talked about many of the causes of the underrepresentation, and many individual as well as institutional factors that play in... as well as individual and institutional solutions we could employ to attempt to improve the situation.

We also talked about how JAWS members and JAWS colleagues could make better use of WomenIn Media & News's POWER (Perspectives Of Women Expand Reporting) Sources Project -- the first project of its kind, founded in 2001, the POWER Sources Project is anational network of ethnically, geographically and professionally diverse women experts who are ready to serve as sources for journalists. We've helped print, broadcast and online journalists connect with articulate, informative, media savvy, qualified sources on hundreds of topics. These are not people journalists can call only when looking for "women sources" -- they're go-to resources for journalists looking for great sources, period.

Anyway, there's much more to say about this session, but it's 8am and I'm already missing breakfast. I will likely be posting guest posts from JAWS members throughout the day or the following week. JAWS members are learning to liveblog - some for the first time - so their posts will most likely happen at http://jaws07.blogspot.com/ -- check it out. But, we will likely bring you JAWS' members reflections on the content and representation discussion, as we feel this is an important set of reflections from women in the trenches, and it's crucial that the larger public understands that women (and especially women of color) working in journalism at every level -- from interns and new beat reporters to high-level execs, news managers and news division heads share some of the same frustrations WIMN's Voices readers do... the structural critique we have of media content linked to media consolidation is real, and very relevant to the ability of journalists being able to do their jobs most effetively, inclusively and to most authenticaly cover our communities.

NOTE TO JAWS ATTENDEES: I'd like to repeat the invitation I made last night at the post-dinner session, to write up your reflections on the discussions we had last night about representations of women in news media (sourcing, content areas, solutions, whatever you discussed), so that our readership -- 90,000 unique visits per month on a good month -- who are extremely interested in issues related to women and the media will be able to hear some of the frustrations, challenges, solutions and strategies from women in the media biz. If you would like to post, email info[at]wimnonline[dot]org

Breakfast Blog

Am I ever glad I dragged myself out of bed at the crack of dawn (well, 7:30 a.m.) to get to the breakfast chat with Gail Ross and Jane Isay, who gave us a lively primer on the elements of conceptualizing, writing, selling and publishing a book. I know they've been speakers before, but these two could be a standing panel, as far as I'm concerned.

Learning new skills?!?!?


Yes, folks, that's Jean Gaddy Wilson in her first-ever bartending experience. She knows that JAWdesses are thirsty women!! Thanks, Jean!!!

What did we look like on day 1?

The pre-event for JAWS was a multimedia bootcamp led by Janice Castro professor in new media, photojournalism, magazine development and media management at Northwestern
University’s Medill School of Journalism.

Unfortunately, after promising camp organizers that there would be enough bandwidth for a conference of journalists, the Stone Harbor Resort had to send in technical help. This guy wasn't much help, he mostly stood around.




Not being able to get on line changed the program a bit but everyone was given an assignment and asked to cover the rest of camp with video cameras, digital recorders and running commentary.


Everyone was anxious to eat dinner, but patiently stood in line for the grub.


Okay, so I have gotten this far and it is taking forever. This blogging software is not as intuitive and I would like. Each time I try to insert a photo at the bottom, it pops up at the top. I have finally had to resort to editing the html code. So I guess I need some consultation with Fish.

Here are a few more photos from the evening events.

.

What would introductions be without Lynn Sweet as timekeeper?

.



Nobody dares go over the time limit. "Introduce myself in 10 seconds? Ouch! Even incoming President Dawn Garcia doesn't escape Lynn's watch!



.





Friday, September 28, 2007

Where are the sources?

"We've Come a Long Way - Maybe" was the topic of Friday night's roundtable discussions.

"Sexism is a daily battle," was the conclusion of one group. Getting women in the news as sources, portraying women fairly and taking action were among the topics of discussion.

Here are some of the links we liked from the session:

Celina Ottaway suggests this article (it's a PDF) about The Sourcing Project.

SheSource is an online resource for journalists.

Women in Media and News is another resource.

And here are just a few of the great ideas for JAWS to consider:

  • Consider an annual "gems and jabs" list on gender coverage.
  • Consider an annual report card for coverage of issues important to women.
  • Consider publishing a collection of great journalism by women.
There's more, but it's late... feel free to add if you were there, to comment if you weren't!!


Welcome to the JAWS Blog 2007!

We'll be posting here during camp, hopefully live-blogging some meetings, adding photos and video, etc. as part of the JAWS multimedia bootcamp experience.